(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>data>X507B-X508A-2I-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:17:53"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" NIL)
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>DATA>X508B-2I-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:24:33"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" Support) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" Support) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
Support) (NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" Support) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value"
Support) (NC00533 "Historical Importance of European Perception" Support) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" Support) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" Support) (NC00092 "German & UK Interest in Cruise"
Support) (NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" Support) (NC00095
"Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" Comment) (NC00093 "US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" Comment) (NC00094
"US Unclear on Cruise Role" Support) (NC00169 "NATO Triad" Support) (NC00333 "NATO First Use Doctrine"
Support) (NC00167 "More Bang For the Buck" Support) (NC00168 "USSR Counters US TNF's in 1960's"
Comment) (NC00383 "Basis of First Use Choice" Support) (NC00572 "Dulles on More Bang for the Buck"
Support) (NC00381 "Flaw in NATO Doctrine" Support) (NC00375 "German Support for Deterrence" Comment) (
NC00340 "Europeans Interested in Deterrence" Support) (NC00113 "Capabilities of New Missiles" Support)
(NC00066 "Pershing II Speed" Support) (NC00098 "Accuracy of Pershing II" Support) (NC00290
"GLCM Poses Large Threat to USSR" Support) (NC00067 "Tomahawk Characteristics" Comment) (NC00099
"Origins of Pershing II" Support) (NC00100 "Range Increases on Pershing" Support) (NC00499
"SS20 vs Predecessors" Support) (NC00082 "SS20 As Routine Modernization" Comment) (NC00081
"Origins of SS20" Support) (NC00500 "SS20 as SS16 Stepchild" Support) (NC00079 "SS20 Characteristics"
Support) (NC00084 "SS20 Weaknesses" Support) (NC00506 "Erroneous SS20 Accuracy Claim" Comment)))
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>DATA>X508B1-1-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:29:40"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" footnote) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" footnote) (NC00533
"Historical Importance of European Perception" footnote) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
footnote) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value" footnote) (NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization"
footnote) (NC00076 "Schmidt's View of SS20 Role" footnote) (NC00075
"Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" footnote) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" footnote) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" footnote) (NC00072
"Deployment Based partly on Need for Modernization" footnote) (NC00092
"German & UK Interest in Cruise" Support) (NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" Support) (
NC00095 "Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" Comment) (NC00093 "US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" Comment) (
NC00094 "US Unclear on Cruise Role" Support) (NC00169 "NATO Triad" Support) (NC00333
"NATO First Use Doctrine" Support) (NC00167 "More Bang For the Buck" Support) (NC00168
"USSR Counters US TNF's in 1960's" Comment) (NC00383 "Basis of First Use Choice" Support) (NC00572
"Dulles on More Bang for the Buck" Support) (NC00381 "Flaw in NATO Doctrine" Support) (NC00375
"German Support for Deterrence" Comment) (NC00340 "Europeans Interested in Deterrence" Support) (
NC00113 "Capabilities of New Missiles" Support) (NC00066 "Pershing II Speed" Support) (NC00098
"Accuracy of Pershing II" Support) (NC00290 "GLCM Poses Large Threat to USSR" Support) (NC00067
"Tomahawk Characteristics" Comment) (NC00099 "Origins of Pershing II" Support) (NC00100
"Range Increases on Pershing" Support) (NC00499 "SS20 vs Predecessors" Support) (NC00082
"SS20 As Routine Modernization" Comment) (NC00081 "Origins of SS20" Support) (NC00500
"SS20 as SS16 Stepchild" Support) (NC00079 "SS20 Characteristics" Support) (NC00084 "SS20 Weaknesses"
Support) (NC00506 "Erroneous SS20 Accuracy Claim" Comment)))
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>DATA>X508B2-1-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:34:51"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" footnote) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" footnote) (NC00533
"Historical Importance of European Perception" footnote) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
footnote) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value" footnote) (NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization"
footnote) (NC00076 "Schmidt's View of SS20 Role" footnote) (NC00075
"Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" footnote) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" footnote) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" footnote) (NC00072
"Deployment Based partly on Need for Modernization" footnote) (NC00092
"German & UK Interest in Cruise" Support) (NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" Support) (
NC00095 "Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" Comment) (NC00093 "US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" Comment) (
NC00094 "US Unclear on Cruise Role" Support) (NC00113 "Capabilities of New Missiles" Support) (NC00066
"Pershing II Speed" Support) (NC00098 "Accuracy of Pershing II" Support) (NC00290
"GLCM Poses Large Threat to USSR" Support) (NC00067 "Tomahawk Characteristics" Comment) (NC00099
"Origins of Pershing II" Support) (NC00100 "Range Increases on Pershing" Support)))
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>data>X509A-2I-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:40:42"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" footnote) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" footnote) (NC00533
"Historical Importance of European Perception" footnote) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
footnote) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value" footnote) (NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization"
footnote) (NC00076 "Schmidt's View of SS20 Role" footnote) (NC00075
"Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" footnote) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" footnote) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" footnote) (NC00072
"Deployment Based partly on Need for Modernization" footnote) (NC00092
"German & UK Interest in Cruise" Support) (NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" Support) (
NC00095 "Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" Comment) (NC00093 "US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" Comment) (
NC00094 "US Unclear on Cruise Role" Support) (NC00113 "Capabilities of New Missiles" Support) (NC00066
"Pershing II Speed" Support) (NC00098 "Accuracy of Pershing II" Support) (NC00290
"GLCM Poses Large Threat to USSR" Support) (NC00067 "Tomahawk Characteristics" Comment) (NC00099
"Origins of Pershing II" Support) (NC00100 "Range Increases on Pershing" Support) (NC00580
"Characterization of Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00369 "Lack of Public Support for NATO Nukes"
footnote) (NC00542 "Five Reasons for Lack of Public Support" footnote) (NC00160
"October 1983 Demonstrations" Unspecified) (NC00159 "1982 BRD Poll" footnote) (NC00484
"Scale of German Opposition" footnote) (NC00162 "Krefeld Petition" footnote) (NC00284
"Neu-Ulm Protests" footnote) (NC00441 "Luns on Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00439
"Kelly Defends Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00582 "Characterization of German Movement" footnote) (
NC00604 "Precis of European Objections to New Missiles" Rebuttal) (NC00442
"Kelly Sees Europe in the Middle" footnote) (NC00163 "Missiles in BRD A Violation of Constitution"
footnote) (NC00165 "German Criticism of US Nuclear Doctrine" footnote) (NC00166
"Fear that Military Logic Dominates Decision-Making" footnote) (NC00291
"New Missiles Attract USSR Attack" footnote) (NC00285 "New NATO Independence" footnote) (NC00456
"Steam is Gone From Anti-Nuke Movement" footnote)))
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>data>X509B-X510A-2I-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:47:10"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" footnote) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" footnote) (NC00533
"Historical Importance of European Perception" footnote) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
footnote) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value" footnote) (NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization"
footnote) (NC00076 "Schmidt's View of SS20 Role" footnote) (NC00075
"Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" footnote) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" footnote) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" footnote) (NC00072
"Deployment Based partly on Need for Modernization" footnote) (NC00522
"Luns on Origins of Modernization" footnote) (NC00093 "US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" footnote) (
NC00094 "US Unclear on Cruise Role" footnote) (NC00095 "Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (
NC00092 "German & UK Interest in Cruise" footnote) (NC00095 "Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (
NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" footnote) (NC00113 "Capabilities of New Missiles"
Support) (NC00066 "Pershing II Speed" Support) (NC00098 "Accuracy of Pershing II" Support) (NC00290
"GLCM Poses Large Threat to USSR" Support) (NC00067 "Tomahawk Characteristics" Comment) (NC00099
"Origins of Pershing II" Support) (NC00100 "Range Increases on Pershing" Support) (NC00540
"Unique Elements of 1979 Decision" footnote) (NC00587 "Importance of December 1979 Decision" footnote)
(NC00107 "NATO Decision Not So Simple As Often Portrayed" footnote) (NC00580
"Characterization of Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00369 "Lack of Public Support for NATO Nukes"
footnote) (NC00542 "Five Reasons for Lack of Public Support" footnote) (NC00160
"October 1983 Demonstrations" Unspecified) (NC00159 "1982 BRD Poll" footnote) (NC00484
"Scale of German Opposition" footnote) (NC00162 "Krefeld Petition" footnote) (NC00284
"Neu-Ulm Protests" footnote) (NC00441 "Luns on Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00439
"Kelly Defends Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00582 "Characterization of German Movement" footnote) (
NC00604 "Precis of European Objections to New Missiles" Rebuttal) (NC00442
"Kelly Sees Europe in the Middle" footnote) (NC00163 "Missiles in BRD A Violation of Constitution"
footnote) (NC00165 "German Criticism of US Nuclear Doctrine" footnote) (NC00166
"Fear that Military Logic Dominates Decision-Making" footnote) (NC00291
"New Missiles Attract USSR Attack" footnote) (NC00285 "New NATO Independence" footnote) (NC00456
"Steam is Gone From Anti-Nuke Movement" footnote) (NC00520 "Luns: Peace is Now Closer" footnote) (
NC00524 "Luns: New Missiles Make Europe Safer" footnote) (NC00525 "US Ambassador Sees NATO Cohesion"
footnote) (NC00516 "Rogers: Deployments Aid Negotiation" footnote) (NC00304
"Deployment seen as necessary to negotiation" footnote) (NC00129
"Lack of NATO Enthusiasm in INF Talks" footnote) (NC00128 "INF Talks Begin" footnote) (NC00130
"NATO-Created Obstacles to INF Agreement" footnote) (NC00133 "US Opening Position" footnote) (NC00134
"Soviet Opening Position" footnote) (NC00139 "Talks Presently Stalled" See) (NC00136
"Movement in Talks" footnote) (NC00140 "Reagan Admin. View of INF Talks" footnote) (NC00493
"Allies Urged US to Soften Zero Option" footnote) (NC00466 "Germans Call for Revival of Walk in Woods"
footnote)))
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>DATA>X510B-1-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:52:20"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" footnote) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" footnote) (NC00533
"Historical Importance of European Perception" footnote) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
footnote) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value" footnote) (NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization"
footnote) (NC00076 "Schmidt's View of SS20 Role" footnote) (NC00075
"Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" footnote) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" footnote) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" footnote) (NC00522 "Luns on Origins of Modernization"
footnote) (NC00072 "Deployment Based partly on Need for Modernization" footnote) (NC00093
"US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" footnote) (NC00094 "US Unclear on Cruise Role" footnote) (NC00095
"Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (NC00092 "German & UK Interest in Cruise" footnote) (NC00095
"Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" footnote) (
NC00070 "US & Soviet TNF's (table)" footnote) (NC00066 "Pershing II Speed" footnote) (NC00067
"Tomahawk Characteristics" footnote) (NC00099 "Origins of Pershing II" footnote) (NC00097
"Attraction Of Pershing II" footnote) (NC00100 "Range Increases on Pershing" footnote) (NC00100
"Range Increases on Pershing" footnote) (NC00096 "Pershing II an Afterthought" footnote) (NC00610
"%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote) (NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote)
(NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote) (NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%""
footnote) (NC00540 "Unique Elements of 1979 Decision" footnote) (NC00587
"Importance of December 1979 Decision" footnote) (NC00580 "Characterization of Peace Movement"
footnote) (NC00369 "Lack of Public Support for NATO Nukes" footnote) (NC00542
"Five Reasons for Lack of Public Support" footnote) (NC00160 "October 1983 Demonstrations" Unspecified
) (NC00159 "1982 BRD Poll" footnote) (NC00484 "Scale of German Opposition" footnote) (NC00162
"Krefeld Petition" footnote) (NC00284 "Neu-Ulm Protests" footnote) (NC00441 "Luns on Peace Movement"
footnote) (NC00439 "Kelly Defends Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00582
"Characterization of German Movement" footnote) (NC00604
"Precis of European Objections to New Missiles" Rebuttal) (NC00442 "Kelly Sees Europe in the Middle"
footnote) (NC00163 "Missiles in BRD A Violation of Constitution" footnote) (NC00165
"German Criticism of US Nuclear Doctrine" footnote) (NC00166
"Fear that Military Logic Dominates Decision-Making" footnote) (NC00291
"New Missiles Attract USSR Attack" footnote) (NC00285 "New NATO Independence" footnote) (NC00456
"Steam is Gone From Anti-Nuke Movement" footnote) (NC00520 "Luns: Peace is Now Closer" footnote) (
NC00524 "Luns: New Missiles Make Europe Safer" footnote) (NC00525 "US Ambassador Sees NATO Cohesion"
footnote) (NC00516 "Rogers: Deployments Aid Negotiation" footnote) (NC00304
"Deployment seen as necessary to negotiation" footnote) (NC00129
"Lack of NATO Enthusiasm in INF Talks" footnote) (NC00128 "INF Talks Begin" footnote) (NC00130
"NATO-Created Obstacles to INF Agreement" footnote) (NC00133 "US Opening Position" footnote) (NC00134
"Soviet Opening Position" footnote) (NC00139 "Talks Presently Stalled" See) (NC00136
"Movement in Talks" footnote) (NC00140 "Reagan Admin. View of INF Talks" footnote) (NC00493
"Allies Urged US to Soften Zero Option" footnote) (NC00466 "Germans Call for Revival of Walk in Woods"
footnote)))
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>DATA>X513A-1-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 18:57:32"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" footnote) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" footnote) (NC00533
"Historical Importance of European Perception" footnote) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
footnote) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value" footnote) (NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization"
footnote) (NC00076 "Schmidt's View of SS20 Role" footnote) (NC00075
"Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" footnote) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" footnote) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" footnote) (NC00522 "Luns on Origins of Modernization"
footnote) (NC00072 "Deployment Based partly on Need for Modernization" footnote) (NC00093
"US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" footnote) (NC00094 "US Unclear on Cruise Role" footnote) (NC00095
"Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (NC00092 "German & UK Interest in Cruise" footnote) (NC00095
"Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" footnote) (
NC00070 "US & Soviet TNF's (table)" footnote) (NC00066 "Pershing II Speed" footnote) (NC00067
"Tomahawk Characteristics" footnote) (NC00099 "Origins of Pershing II" footnote) (NC00097
"Attraction Of Pershing II" footnote) (NC00100 "Range Increases on Pershing" footnote) (NC00100
"Range Increases on Pershing" footnote) (NC00096 "Pershing II an Afterthought" footnote) (NC00610
"%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote) (NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote)
(NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote) (NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%""
footnote) (NC00540 "Unique Elements of 1979 Decision" footnote) (NC00587
"Importance of December 1979 Decision" footnote) (NC00162 "Krefeld Petition" footnote) (NC00159
"1982 BRD Poll" footnote) (NC00484 "Scale of German Opposition" footnote) (NC00160
"October 1983 Demonstrations" footnote) (NC00284 "Neu-Ulm Protests" footnote) (NC00484
"Scale of German Opposition" footnote) (NC00580 "Characterization of Peace Movement" footnote) (
NC00582 "Characterization of German Movement" footnote) (NC00542
"Five Reasons for Lack of Public Support" footnote) (NC00441 "Luns on Peace Movement" footnote) (
NC00439 "Kelly Defends Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00604
"Precis of European Objections to New Missiles" footnote) (NC00291 "New Missiles Attract USSR Attack"
footnote) (NC00442 "Kelly Sees Europe in the Middle" footnote) (NC00163
"Missiles in BRD A Violation of Constitution" footnote) (NC00166
"Fear that Military Logic Dominates Decision-Making" footnote) (NC00165
"German Criticism of US Nuclear Doctrine" footnote) (NC00483 "Belgian Coaltion Problems" footnote) (
NC00293 "Danish Government Opposition" footnote) (NC00471 "Danish Opposition Impact" footnote) (
NC00158 "Opposition in BRD Leads to Deployments Elsewhere" footnote) (NC00285 "New NATO Independence"
footnote) (NC00369 "Lack of Public Support for NATO Nukes" footnote) (NC00456
"Steam is Gone From Anti-Nuke Movement" footnote) (NC00520 "Luns: Peace is Now Closer" footnote) (
NC00524 "Luns: New Missiles Make Europe Safer" footnote) (NC00525 "US Ambassador Sees NATO Cohesion"
footnote) (NC00516 "Rogers: Deployments Aid Negotiation" footnote) (NC00304
"Deployment seen as necessary to negotiation" footnote) (NC00129
"Lack of NATO Enthusiasm in INF Talks" footnote) (NC00128 "INF Talks Begin" footnote) (NC00130
"NATO-Created Obstacles to INF Agreement" footnote) (NC00133 "US Opening Position" footnote) (NC00134
"Soviet Opening Position" footnote) (NC00139 "Talks Presently Stalled" See) (NC00136
"Movement in Talks" footnote) (NC00140 "Reagan Admin. View of INF Talks" footnote) (NC00493
"Allies Urged US to Soften Zero Option" footnote) (NC00466 "Germans Call for Revival of Walk in Woods"
footnote)))
)
(* * NoteFile: {QV}<notecards>data>X514B-2I-NATO-MISSILES.NOTEFILE)
(
((* * Output from (NCDATA.LinksFromCard "OUTLINE")
on "10-Sep-85 19:04:13"
)
(NC00579 "OUTLINE" ((NC00539 "Deployment Based on European Insecurity" footnote) (NC00074
"German Interest in Nuclear Modernization" footnote) (NC00533
"Historical Importance of European Perception" footnote) (NC00534 "Late 70's European Concern With US"
footnote) (NC00564 "New TNF Coupling Value" footnote) (NC00075 "Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization"
footnote) (NC00076 "Schmidt's View of SS20 Role" footnote) (NC00075
"Schmidt's View of TNF Modernization" footnote) (NC00117
"1978 HLG Decision to Increase TNF Capabilities" footnote) (NC00073
"Shift to Nuclear Focus in Modernization Plans" footnote) (NC00522 "Luns on Origins of Modernization"
footnote) (NC00072 "Deployment Based partly on Need for Modernization" footnote) (NC00093
"US Pressured Europe to Adopt GLCM" footnote) (NC00094 "US Unclear on Cruise Role" footnote) (NC00095
"Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (NC00092 "German & UK Interest in Cruise" footnote) (NC00095
"Euro. Enthusiasm for Cruise" footnote) (NC00501 "SS20 Provides Excuse for New Missiles" footnote) (
NC00070 "US & Soviet TNF's (table)" footnote) (NC00066 "Pershing II Speed" footnote) (NC00067
"Tomahawk Characteristics" footnote) (NC00099 "Origins of Pershing II" footnote) (NC00097
"Attraction Of Pershing II" footnote) (NC00100 "Range Increases on Pershing" footnote) (NC00100
"Range Increases on Pershing" footnote) (NC00096 "Pershing II an Afterthought" footnote) (NC00610
"%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote) (NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote)
(NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%"" footnote) (NC00610 "%"NATO Communique, Dec. 12, 1979%""
footnote) (NC00540 "Unique Elements of 1979 Decision" footnote) (NC00587
"Importance of December 1979 Decision" footnote) (NC00162 "Krefeld Petition" footnote) (NC00159
"1982 BRD Poll" footnote) (NC00484 "Scale of German Opposition" footnote) (NC00160
"October 1983 Demonstrations" footnote) (NC00284 "Neu-Ulm Protests" footnote) (NC00484
"Scale of German Opposition" footnote) (NC00580 "Characterization of Peace Movement" footnote) (
NC00582 "Characterization of German Movement" footnote) (NC00542
"Five Reasons for Lack of Public Support" footnote) (NC00441 "Luns on Peace Movement" footnote) (
NC00439 "Kelly Defends Peace Movement" footnote) (NC00604
"Precis of European Objections to New Missiles" footnote) (NC00291 "New Missiles Attract USSR Attack"
footnote) (NC00442 "Kelly Sees Europe in the Middle" footnote) (NC00163
"Missiles in BRD A Violation of Constitution" footnote) (NC00166
"Fear that Military Logic Dominates Decision-Making" footnote) (NC00165
"German Criticism of US Nuclear Doctrine" footnote) (NC00483 "Belgian Coaltion Problems" footnote) (
NC00293 "Danish Government Opposition" footnote) (NC00471 "Danish Opposition Impact" footnote) (
NC00158 "Opposition in BRD Leads to Deployments Elsewhere" footnote) (NC00161
"US-European Relations Soured" footnote) (NC00285 "New NATO Independence" footnote) (NC00285
"New NATO Independence" footnote) (NC00369 "Lack of Public Support for NATO Nukes" footnote) (NC00456
"Steam is Gone From Anti-Nuke Movement" footnote) (NC00524 "Luns: New Missiles Make Europe Safer"
footnote) (NC00520 "Luns: Peace is Now Closer" footnote) (NC00520 "Luns: Peace is Now Closer" footnote
) (NC00525 "US Ambassador Sees NATO Cohesion" footnote) (NC00304
"Deployment seen as necessary to negotiation" footnote) (NC00516
"Rogers: Deployments Aid Negotiation" footnote) (NC00035 "Provisions of Brezhnev Initiative" footnote
) (NC00305 "Carter Reaction to Brezhnev Initiative" footnote) (NC00305
"Carter Reaction to Brezhnev Initiative" footnote) (NC00038
"NATO Political Reasons for Rejection of Brezhnev Initiative" footnote) (NC00308
"Schmidt's Reaction to Brezhnev Proposal" footnote) (NC00307
"Left-wing German Reaction to Brezhnev Initiative" footnote) (NC00140
"Reagan Admin. View of INF Talks" footnote) (NC00129 "Lack of NATO Enthusiasm in INF Talks" footnote)
(NC00129 "Lack of NATO Enthusiasm in INF Talks" footnote) (NC00133 "US Opening Position" footnote) (
NC00134 "Soviet Opening Position" footnote) (NC00136 "Movement in Talks" footnote) (NC00136
"Movement in Talks" footnote) (NC00493 "Allies Urged US to Soften Zero Option" footnote) (NC00466
"Germans Call for Revival of Walk in Woods" footnote) (NC00152 "Soviets Walk Out of INF Talks"
footnote) (NC00139 "Talks Presently Stalled" footnote) (NC00190 "Conventional Defense Practical"
footnote) (NC00188 "Soviet Conventional Superiority Denied" footnote) (NC00374
"Neglect of Conventional Readiness" footnote) (NC00409 "Raise Nuclear Threshold" footnote) (NC00339
"Bradley on Nuclear Dilemma " footnote) (NC00342 "Estimates of German Casualities" footnote)))
)