Number: 1806 Date: 10-Aug-84 15':40':19 Submitter: Sannella.PA Source: Masinter.pa Subject: Figure out how to package/deliver patches to customers Lisp Version: Description: ' Date': 13 Jul 84 17':37 PDT' From': Masinter.pa' Subject': INTPATCH for running SPY in Fugue.6' To': 1100Support, LispFriends^' cc': LispCore^' reply-to': Masinter' ' INTPATCH and INTPATCH.DCOM (required for ''safe'' running if SPY in Fugue.6 and earlier releases) are now on [eris]Fugue.6>Patches>.' ' (To LispCore^': I suggest we follow the convention that ''patches'' to a release be stored on [eris]releasename>PATCHES>. We''ve been pretty haphazard about where they are.)' ' -----' ' Date': 16 Jul 84 15':19 PDT' From': JonL.pa' Subject': Re': INTPATCH for running SPY in Fugue.6' In-reply-to': Masinter.pa''s message of 13 Jul 84 17':37 PDT' To': Masinter.pa' cc': 1100Support.pasa, LispFriends^,LispCore^' Reply-to': JonL.pa' ' ' I added SAVEVMPATCH to the files on {Eris}Fugue.6>PATCHES>. It retro-fits a change to SAVEVM (fixed in the sources three months ago) that trips up RS232 stuff.' ' Incidentally, when I gave out versions of the new RS232 stuff to run on Fugue.6/Carol sysouts, I had only one patch file -- called FUGUE6PATCH. Wouldn''t it make for smoother operation to combine INTPATCH and SAVEVMPATCH as I did with FUGUE6PATCH and basically just have one patch file called, say, {Eris}ReleaseName>PATCHES and .DCOM ?' ' -- JonL --' ' -----' ' Date': 16 Jul 84 15':27 PDT' From': Masinter.pa' Subject': Re': INTPATCH for running SPY in Fugue.6' In-reply-to': JonL.pa''s message of 16 Jul 84 15':19 PDT' To': JonL.pa' cc': LispSupport, 1100Support.pasa' ' I think we get enough incremental orthogonal patches that separating them out makes sense, at least for Xerox internal users. ' ' There is a separate ''operations'' issue of how the operations staff wants to deliver patches to customers. It might make sense to send out a single file which they generate by merging all of the other files together, or maybe just a single ''patches'' floppy....' ' -----' ' Date': 16 Jul 84 17':50 PDT' From': JonL.pa' Subject': Re': INTPATCH for running SPY in Fugue.6' In-reply-to': Masinter.pa''s message of 16 Jul 84 15':27 PDT' To': Masinter.pa' cc': JonL.pa, LispSupport.pa, 1100Support.pasa' ' Well, why not just periodically append all the incremental patch files into a composite file, so that even internal users need load only one file of patchs.' ' -- JonL --' ' Workaround: Test Case: Edit-By: Edit-Date: Attn: Sannella, Raim Assigned To: In/By: Disposition: System: Other Software Subsystem: Release Procedure Machine: Disk: Microcode Version: Memory Size: File Server: Server Software Version: Difficulty: Frequency: Impact: Annoying Priority: Perhaps Status: Open Problem Type: Documentation Source Files: