Number: 333 Date: 28-Mar-84 8':52':28 Submitter: Sannella.PA Source: ROACH.PA Subject: LISTFILES should try to list non-Interlisp files Lisp Version: Description: ' Date': 27 MAR 84 11':12 PST' From': ROACH.PA' Subject': LISTFILES FAILS TO LIST NON-INTERLISP FILES' To': LISPSUPPORT, JONL' cc': ROACH' ' I''m sick and tired of this problem. It almost seems that ' LISPCORE^ isn''t even considering the possibility of a user wanting' to list a file not made with MAKEFILE. Various text files always' try to be parsed as filepackage files, fail, break, and don''t list.' The latest failure': (LISTFILES {PHYLUM}EMACS>COMS).' Kelly' -----' Date': 27 MAR 84 11':15 PST' From': ROACH.PA' Subject': RE': Previous msg' To': LISPSUPPORT' ' The test case is (LISTFILES {PHYLUM}EMACS>PRIMIT).' Kelly' -----' ' Date': 29 MAR 84 13':13 PST' From': JONL.PA' Subject': Re': LISTFILES FAILS TO LIST NON-INTERLISP FILES' To': ROACH, LISPSUPPORT' cc': JONL' ' In response to the message sent 27 MAR 84 11':12 PST from ROACH.PA' ' Kelly, I had no trouble at all listing those two files with LISTFILES --' I''ve left the hardcopy on your desk.' ' Questions': do you have a recent version of SINGLEFILINDEX? you should' be fetching it from Library> rather than Library> (when' there has been sufficient usage, then the version should' be moved to ). However, I''m not aware of bugs even in the Library>' version which would cause the behaviour you describe.' ' Finally, what sysout were you using? There has been a bug (for years?) in' the lisp function GETFILEMAP, which I fixed on about March 11, 1984; the' manifestation of this bug would be an error of some sort when you tried' to listfiles of certain peculiar non-Lisp files.' ' If this keeps happening to you, but not to me, then I can understand why' you are "sick and tired" . . . maybe there is a ROACHFLG in the system' that adds additional bugs when a ROACH is running?' ' -----' ' Date': 3 Apr 84 20':34 PST' From': Kaplan.pa' Subject': Re': AR 333': LISTFILES should try to list non-Interlisp files' In-reply-to': LispSupport.pa''s message of 28 Mar 84 08':53':03 PST (Wednesday)' To': LispSupport.pa, Roach' ' Is this a problem with standard LISTFILES, or a problem when you have SINGLEFILEINDEX loaded?' ' If the latter, then this AR should be passed off to JonL.' ' --Ron' Workaround: Test Case: Edit-By: Sannella.PA Edit-Date: 13-Apr-84 14':42':09 Attn: Assigned To: In/By: Disposition: ' [Date': 12 Apr 84 23':51 PST' From': JonL.pa' Subject': AR 333' This AR is closed, as far as I''m concerned. It''s apparent that Kelly''s problem was that described in AR 494; namely, he had redefined BREAKCHECK, thereby subverting the NLSETQ''s in various system functions.] System: Windows and Graphics Subsystem: Printing Machine: Disk: Microcode Version: Memory Size: File Server: Server Software Version: Difficulty: Frequency: Everytime Impact: Moderate Priority: Perhaps Status: Declined Problem Type: Design - Impl Source Files: