Number: 1824 Date: 13-Aug-84 9':22':02 Submitter: Sannella.PA Source: Roach.pa Subject: Mesa 11.0 Dlionfs MUST do something reasonable if started on Mesa 10.0 machine (& vice versa) Assigned To: Stansbury Attn: Release Status: Fixed In/By: Problem Type: Bug Impact: Serious Difficulty: Moderate Frequency: Everytime Priority: Absolutely System: Operating System Subsystem: DLion Disk Machine: Disk: Lisp Version: Source Files: Microcode Version: Memory Size: File Server: Server Software Version: Disposition: From': stansbury.pa' Subject': Mesa 11.0 Dlionfs MUST do something reasonable if started on Mesa 10.0 machine' To': Roach, Lispsupport, Kaplan' cc': stansbury.pa' ' Dlionfs now detects non-Klamath disk formats and refuses to use them. In the case of {dsk}, it creates the usual coredevice replacement.' ' -- Tayloe.' ' ["stansbury" " 9-Sep-84 17':24':44" Assigned% To': Attn': Status':(Open->Fixed) Disposition':]' ["Sannella.PA" "12-Sep-84 12':21':18" Subject': Description':] Description: ' Date': 11 Aug 84 10':42 PDT' From': Roach.pa' Subject': re': DLIONFS Does Not Work.' In-reply-to': LispSupport.pa''s message of 10 Aug 84 18':37':10 PDT (Friday)' To': LispSupport.pa' cc': Roach.pa' ' If the machine is Mesa 10 and the DLIONFS is Mesa 11, I expect the DLIONFS to detect this and do something sensible such as printing a message and creating a core {DSK}. I can''t pick out a public Dandelion and know that it is Mesa 11 vs Mesa 10 and I can''t do system work in a <LISP>CURRENT> sysout. Even when I''m not doing system work, I use <LISPCORE>NEXT> sysouts to help the group debugging process.' ' -----' ' Date': 10 Sep 84 18':17 PDT' From': JonL.pa' Subject': Re': Mesa 11.0 Dlionfs MUST do something reasonable if started on Mesa 10.0 machine' In-reply-to': stansbury.pa''s message of 9 Sep 84 17':23 PDT' To': stansbury.pa' cc': Roach.pa, Lispsupport.pa, Kaplan.pa' ' I''m still a little confused about the state of Mesa 10.0 Dlionfs -- I ran an older sysout on my DLion, which had been (painstakingly!) configured for Mesa 11.0, and it seems to have wiped me out. Any hope?' ' -- JonL --' ' -----' ' Date': 11 Sep 84 12':19 PDT' From': Stansbury.pa' Subject': Re': Mesa 11.0 Dlionfs MUST do something reasonable if started on Mesa 10.0 machine' In-reply-to': JonL.pa''s message of 10 Sep 84 18':17 PDT' To': JonL.pa' cc': stansbury.pa, Roach.pa, Lispsupport.pa, Kaplan.pa' ' I''m not going to go back to fix the Sierra-compatible file system to behave gracefully on a Klamath disk and then remake all Carol-based loadups. Instead, if for some reason you have need of running a Carol-based loadup on a dlion, load it on a Dorado, load all the Klamath-compatible file system files (dlionfs, volumedirectory, volumefilemap, volumeallocationmap) from lispcore>sources, sysout, and run the result on your dlion.' ' As for patching up your trashed dsk volume, I''m afraid there isn''t much you can do. You''ll probably have to makepilot, erase the volume, and mkdir again. Sorry.' ' -- Tayloe.' ' -----' ' Date': 11 Sep 84 12':53 PDT' From': JonL.pa' Subject': Re': Mesa 11.0 Dlionfs MUST do something reasonable if started on Mesa 10.0 machine' In-reply-to': Stansbury.pa''s message of 11 Sep 84 12':19 PDT' To': Stansbury.pa' cc': JonL.pa, Roach.pa, Lispsupport.pa, Kaplan.pa' ' Ok, just to get the record straight': I can take a Carol sysout, overload the DLion fs with the new Klamath-compatible one, dump that sysout out, and then run that on a Mesa.11 DLion?' ' -- JonL --' ' ' -----' ' Date': 11 Sep 84 13':40 PDT' From': Stansbury.pa' Subject': Re': Mesa 11.0 Dlionfs MUST do something reasonable if started on Mesa 10.0 machine' In-reply-to': JonL.pa''s message of 11 Sep 84 12':53 PDT' To': JonL.pa' cc': Stansbury.pa, Roach.pa, Lispsupport.pa, Kaplan.pa' ' ...' Yup!' ' -- T.' ' Workaround: Test Case: Edit-By: Sannella.PA Edit-Date: 12-Sep-84 12':21':18