Number: 1703

Date: 25-Jul-84 23':20':33

Submitter: le.pasa

Source:  Bird.pasa

Subject: (SETQ X (LIST Y) (SETQ --)) CLISPIFYs but won''t DWIMIFY back

Assigned To: Masinter

Attn: 

Status: Closed

In/By: 

Problem Type: Bug

Impact: Annoying

Difficulty: 

Frequency: Everytime

Priority: Perhaps

System: Programming Environment

Subsystem: DWIM

Machine: 1108

Disk: 

Lisp Version: carol>full.sysout

Source Files: 

Microcode Version: 

Memory Size: 

File Server: 

Server Software Version: 

Disposition: '
["Sannella.PA" "21-Aug-84 18':20':13" Status':(Fixed->Closed)]

Description: '
   Function specified below CLISPIFY''s quite happily but won''t DWIMIFY back again.  I have CLISPIFYPACKFLG set to NIL to ease DEDIT.'
'
-----'
'
Date':  9 Aug 84 15':40 PDT'
From': Bird.pasa'
Subject': Re': AR 1703'
To': Le.pasa, Sannella.pa'
cc': Bird.pasa, 1100Support.pasa'
'
This AR could not be investigated because the test case file had been deleted.  I now have a test case but it is extremely obtuse and doesn''t warrant any priority.  I consider it quite likely thattthe same source bug was in my original test case'
'
DEFINEQ((FRED () (SETQ X (LIST Y) (SETQ Z NIL]'
CLISPIFY(FRED)'
DWIMIFY(FRED)'
'
-----'
'
Date': 15 Aug 84 00':56':31 PDT (Wednesday)'
From': Masinter.PA'
Subject': Fixed': AR#1703, (SETQ X (LIST Y) (SETQ --)) CLISPIFYs but won''t DWIMIFY back'
To': Bird.pasa'
cc': 1100Support, LispSupport'
'
I was into CLISPIFY in any case. This now CLISPIFYs as (X←(PROG1 <Y> --)), which has the same semantics and is perhaps clearer.'
'
By the way, I changed the Subject': of the AR from the "Function CLISPIFY''s but won''t DWIMIFY", since your original AR doesn''t really identify the problem enough to recognize it in a list of ARs with Subject only.'
'
Thanks for taking the time to come up with a simple test case.'
'


Workaround: 

Test Case: 

Edit-By: Sannella.PA

Edit-Date: 21-Aug-84 18':20':13